Arlene slates Strictly finalists

Fri Dec 19 11:46AM by TV Editor

Arlene Phillips

Strictly Come Dancing's Arlene Phillips has hit out at this year's finalists, saying none of them are as good as last year's winner Alesha Dixon.

The judge said that, despite being a good dancer, Rachel Stevens isn't a 'bubbly, bouncy girl' like Alesha and she accused bookies' favourite Tom Chambers of 'over-acting', reports The Sun.

Arlene said: "What's odd about Tom is, one would think, because he's an actor, he would know how to portray a dance.

"But we can see him acting the role and that's off-putting."

She added that Lisa Snowdon was the most likeable out of the final three but admitted that she would have preferred to see Austin Healey, who was voted out several weeks ago, win the series.

What do you think of Arlene's comments? Do you think this year's finalists match up to last year's winner Alesha? Let us know what you think...

- Christmas TV highlights | DVDs for Christmas | Yahoo! Christmas special

Comment on this article

Please to add your comments.

User comments

  • (91)

    Arlene should keep her mouth shut! All 3 finalists are just as good as Aleisha

    Posted by: mrs.rhodes on Fri Dec 19 12:56PM | Report abuse
  • (92)

    If the stupid cow wanted Austin to win, why did she vote against him in the dance off?????

    Posted by: richardcliffe on Fri Dec 19 12:56PM | Report abuse
  • (93)

    RD

    Posted by: j.stonestreet on Fri Dec 19 12:56PM | Report abuse
  • (94)

    So if she wanted Austin to win, why did she vote him off?

    Posted by: dougbosley on Fri Dec 19 12:56PM | Report abuse
  • (95)

    Ms Phillips is a wicked twisted ugly old bat who has clearly got too big for her boots and thinks she is bigger tan the show. She vindictively forced John Sargeant to resign from the show because she didn't like the fact that the public liked him and now she doesn't like the publcchoice for the final. If she doesn't like the veiws of the public she shouldn't be paid to work on a show with a public vote. Pleas can the BBC get her fees back. Glenda, Uckfield

    Posted by: glenidixon on Fri Dec 19 12:57PM | Report abuse
  • (96)

    Everyone who watches Strictly knows that the ageing Arlene always fancies the athletic male competitors. So it's no surprise she hasn't got a good word to say about the others, especially about Tom. The competitors this year are of a far higher standard than ever. Maybe Arlene should consider her future on the judging panel if she is going to be so negative about individuals, particularly at this stage of the competition.

    Posted by: mhstewart on Fri Dec 19 12:57PM | Report abuse
  • (97)

    Does it matter! It's a television programme. DYKWIT.

    Posted by: j.stonestreet on Fri Dec 19 12:57PM | Report abuse
  • (98)

    For gods sake. It is supposed to be a fun show.....stop all the @#$%ing...Is this what I pay my TV licence for. How about we start seeing some good quality tv programs not this total @#$%. This has no entertainment factor what so ever.

    Posted by: robby_121 on Fri Dec 19 12:57PM | Report abuse
  • (99)

    I think Arlene is quite right about tom Chamber and about his way he preforms the dances you can just anticipate the moves and the way he thinks. Its not natural or smooth just very in your face. Re Rachel Stevens, how much more can she be wrong, I think Alesha Dixon was in this season she would have been booted off ages agaon Rachel Stevens is a stronger dancer and could even be as good as some of the professionals who have been in the show. Re her comment about Austin Healy, the only reason she is saying this is that she has fancied the pants off of him since he actually stepped onto the dance floor for the 1st time and could be even before then. Yes he was a good dancer but If he was in the final instead of lets say in this instance Tom then Rachel still would have a betterchance of winning. Arlene is very biast towards some celebrities. Just as Len is towards certain dances!!

    Posted by: emt2105 on Fri Dec 19 12:57PM | Report abuse
  • (100)

    0E

    Posted by: rosandrt on Fri Dec 19 12:58PM | Report abuse